×

Warning

JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 527

Novato Republican Women

NRW Presents

Brad Dacus,
Founder, Pacific Justice Institute

May 21 2024
11:30  a.m.- 1:30 p.m.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • All
  • Blog
  • Latest News
  • Default
  • Title
  • Date
  • Random
load more / hold SHIFT key to load all load all

Children categories

Special Events

Special Events (2)

These are special events that are in addition to our regular events.

View items...
Latest News

Latest News (319)

In foreign policy, Donald Trump is the powerful man Barack Obama never could be

View items...
Regular Events

Regular Events (0)

These events happen on a regular schedule.

View items...
Tuesday, 24 September 2019 18:40

The Power of Words

Written by
Triump’s Trials and Tribulations: The Power of Words
 
Since liberals control the media, entertainment, the courts, and the classroom, they control the words. Language both reflects our thought process and informs it. For better or worse, words have connotations, and people avoid association with negative terms. Saul Alinsky in Rules for Radicals says controlling language is key to acquiring power.
 
President Trump, a master persuader and devotee of Norman Vincent Peale’s classic The Power of Positive Thinking, understands language. He knows how to use negative words to deflect opponents’ attacks. Examples include his famous nicknames (Crooked Hillary, Sleepy Joe) and his infamous tweets.  A glance at Showbiz CheatSheet’s 20 most outrageous Trump tweets reveals he tells it like it is. #11, for example,“You are witnessing the single greatest witch hunt in American political history…” refers to the Mueller investigation and was scoffed at before proven true. 
The Power of Positive Thinking recommends Bible passages as brain tools to create prosperity. It warns against negative speech. So President Trump, whose belief in God is stronger than it appears, use today’s instant, international media to send direct messages - usually  positive and motivational - to specific audiences. His words turn negative - and memorable - when an enemy crosses a line.  When Trump says, "We have the best economy in the world,” his positive hyperbole motivates the public to create just that. But by calling Kim Jong Un “Rocketman,” Trump threatens Kim and diminishes his power. Trump doesn’t cares what the public thinks about his tweets; they are tools to motivate or combat specific targets. 
 
Some conservatives prefer dryer, factual language. As the party of personal responsibility, we think we aren’t easily manipulated. But we’re wrong. That artists and writers populate the Left gives it an advantage. Below is a partial list of words the Left has used over decades to manipulate Americans into living its agenda.
“Politically correct” first appeared in the early 20th century to describe overzealous Communists. The Nazis used it to vet party members. By the 1980s, it became code among American liberals to self-identify. By the ’00’s, Americans feared being seen as “incorrect.” Now, with Trump, correctness has begun to seem ridiculous - even to some liberals.  That's because, by crudely calling a spade a spade, Trump diminishes the Left’s control of words.
 
“Progressives” - code for Communists - have co-opted words like “Fairness” and “Justice” to persuade Americans to redistribute wealth.  Since America is powerful, it must be broken into bits to be beaten. So America is “multicultural” and “diverse” rather than one united country of immigrants from international backgrounds. “Diversity” divides individual against individual, making the whole easier to manage, while “multicultural” dissolves borders, leaving citizens with little identity. 
Make no mistake: the goal of identity politics is to destroy identity. It’s vocabulary feels schizophrenic. Over 60 years, “colored people” changed to “people of color,” “negroes” became blacks, blacks became Afro-Americans, (avoiding association with the Afro hairstyle, they became Black again) and, thanks to Barack Obama, they’re now “African Americans.” We have Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans, and Native Americans, but no European-Americans. They’re “white;” being “white” is incorrect. Replacing “nigger” with the “n - word” undermined our freedom of speech by making incorrect vocabulary a crime. In the 70’s, homosexuals and lesbians sought power by uniting under harmless sounding “gay.” Today “gay” has splintered into 63 terms - each, if Nancy Pelosi has her way, a protected class.  The distasteful sounding “Cisgender” replaces “Straight,” slang for the accurate “heterosexual.” Addicts and hobos are “homeless,” describing the result of their actions but not how they live. In short, our words divide and confuse us. 
 
Without accurate words to reflect our identity, we’re open to attack. To paraphrase Saul Alinsky, no one will notice the revolution is happening if they’re upset about something commonplace like the weather. That’s why “Climate Change”  replaced “Global Warming,” which replaced the ‘70s “Global Cooling.” Now, to combat Trump’s policies, the Left has created urgency by replacing “Climage Change” with “Climate Crisis.” 
 
A hundred years ago, Progressive John Dewey, the decimal system guy, discouraged the study of logic and replaced it with “critical thinking,” a euphemism for Marx’s “critical theory.  “A ‘critical theory’ has a distinctive aim: to unmask the ideology falsely justifying some form of social or economic oppression…and, in so doing, to contribute to …ending that oppression.” Students of logic learn tools for accurate reasoning. Critical thinkers assess what they read or experience. They’re easier to manipulate. That’s why critical thinking is taught in schools. 
Conservatives must pay attention to language. We can’t let the Left dictate our vocabulary. If Octavio-Cortez becomes AOC, it gives her JFK status. Don’t fall for that. Suffer through wondering if her first name is Alexandra or Alexandria. Doing so diminishes her power. Take inspiration from Trump’s language mastery. His directness can seem crude, but his words strike like swords. When he controls language, he wins. 
 

As Saul Alinsky once said, “The issue is never the issue.” He meant that whatever issue Leftists appear to have in their sights is not their real focus; their real focus is power, and until they have absolute power, their immediate focus is revolution.

The more desperate Liberals get for power, the more controversial issues take center stage in politics and the news. Perhaps the most controversial issue of the post World War II era is abortion.
This article won’t attempt to change your views; rather it points out that the recent spate of states (New York, Rhode Island, Virginia) amending their constitutions or creating pro-abortion legislation is in reaction to the possibility that, if Justice Ginsberg dies and President Trump appoints another pro-life justice, Roe V. Wade could be overturned. New York and Virginia seek to overturn the 2003 federal law preventing partial birth abortion nationally. And Rhode Island is vacillating between one bill, preventing partial birth but allowing siblings over 25 and grandparents to approve abortions for minors, and The Rhode Island Reproductive Health Care Act which lifts all limitations, including partial birth.

Last year, Rhode Island’s Governor, Catholic Democrat Gina Raimondo, supported including pro-life insurance policies on the state’s Obama care exchanges (wpri.com); she met with a firestorm from the Left who turned against her and raised big money to support another Democrat candidate and unseat her. She won, but has radically changed her views to keep her political career alive.

In the State of the Union, President Trump said: “Lawmakers in New York cheered with delight upon the passage of legislation that would allow a baby to be ripped from the mother’s womb moments before birth…These are living, feeling, beautiful babies who will never get the chance to share their love and dreams with the world.”

What do his words really mean? 1) If viable full term babies can be killed on day one, what’s to prevent killing them the next day, or whenever suits a parent’s need? If a parent isn’t competent to choose, the state would get involved; then the state would determine who lives and dies, no matter the age; 2) therefore, the “beautiful babies” are all of us. If the Left wins their power grab, we may all lose our “chance to share [our] love and dreams.”
A recent CBS poll declared 76% of Americans approved of the president’s speech. According to a 2018 Gallup poll, 87% of Americans oppose late term abortions. The similarity of those numbers shows that most Democrats oppose late term abortion. Science has advanced since 1973, when Roe became law. Not only has medicine provided an array of contraceptives including the “day after pill,” but ultra sound and other advances show fetal development. Of babies born at 22 weeks 25% survive; 90% of those born at 27 weeks do. Only 59 countries allow abortion for any reason; more than half of those demand parental permission; only 6, including the US, allow abortion after the 22nd week. While science has yet to pinpoint the exact moment the soul enters the body; it has provided a clear picture of what’s possible with respect to bringing lives into the world.

With 5 children and 9 grandchildren, the president agrees with the 87 percent. And he knows that states rushing to pass abortion laws are not protecting women. By making late term the new standard, the Left further divides the nation by making abortion a black or white issue. It’s not enough for Americans to support abortion prior to 12 weeks, or 20 weeks, they’ve got to agree with it in any form, at any time, even after a healthy full term birth. To support these extremes, one must be so afraid that one is willing to hand over one’s rights to government - or be hungry for the kind of power that tyrannies provide.

Hunger for power explains why Virginia’s Democrat Governor Northam would include a joke KKK photo in his medical school yearbook, then 40 some years later chillingly support infanticide. His combined actions remind us that the Left brought us slavery and we become their slaves again if we hand over control of the right to life. This right extends beyond the maternity ward to our “inalienable rights” to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” In honor of our rights, it’s important that open-minded discussions on controversial topics continue; regarding abortion, we’re still debating the exact moment life begins. But that important truth is not the issue here. Because the issue is never the issue; the issue is power.

So, when President Trump declared his pro-life views during his recent State of the Union address, he was actually defending the liberty and rights of all Americans.


https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/02/05/democrats-radical-push-on-abortion-will-backfire/
https://news.gallup.com/poll/235469/trimesters-key-abortion-views.aspx
https://www.newsweek.com/babies-born-22-weeks-can-survive-medical-care-new-study-finds-329518
https://www.providencejournal.com/news/20180613/in-governors-race-abortion-dispute-flares-among-democrats
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/10/09/is-the-united-states-one-of-seven-countries-that-allow-elective-abortions-after-20-weeks-of-pregnancy/?
noredirect=on&utm_term=.4c2dfa9e3c4e
https://www.wpri.com/politics/two-abortion-rights-bills-introduced-in-rhode-island/1706784477

Trump's Triumph's #4: Battling the Opiod Crisis 
 
Ever get prescribed an opioid, prior to a root canal perhaps, pay five bucks co-pay, then not use it or maybe use just 1 of the 30 prescribed pills, only to have your teenager ask to sell the rest for big bucks on the street? That’s how a national crisis got started with pharmaceutical companies assuring doctors and patients that opioid painkillers were not addictive. Yet, patients did get addicted, and when prescriptions ran out, illicit drug dealers filled the void.
 
According to the CDC, every day, more than 115 people nationwide die after overdosing on opioids. The increase in deaths involving opioids is so large that it now affects average U.S. life expectancy. “We call it the ‘crisis next door’ because everyone knows someone,” Kelly Ann Conway declared during the president’s recent visit to New Hampshire, which has the second highest rate of opioid-involved overdose deaths in the nation. “It is no longer somebody else’s community, somebody else’s kid...The opioid crisis is viewed by us at the White House as a non-partisan problem searching for a bipartisan solution.” (CNN)
Opioids are a class of drugs that includes everything from the illegal heroin to legal prescription such as oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, morphine, and fentanyl, a powerful narcotic used to manage pain after surgery.
 
Research by the National Institute on Drug Abuse reveals:
 
■ Roughly 21 to 29 percent of patients prescribed opioids for chronic pain misuse them.
■ Between 8 and 12 percent develop an opioid use disorder.
■ An estimated 4 to 6 percent who misuse prescription opioids transition to heroin.
■ About 80 percent of people who use heroin first misused prescription opioids.
■ Opioid overdoses increased 30 percent from July 2016 through September 2017 in 52 areas in 45 states.
■ The Midwestern region saw opioid overdoses increase 70 percent from July 2016 through September 2017.In 2016, overdose deaths exceeded the number of Americans killed during the Vietnam War. Roughly two-thirds of overdose deaths now involve an opioid. Estimates of the total “economic burden” in the United States of prescription opioid misuse is $78.5 billion a year, including costs of healthcare, lost productivity, addiction treatment, and criminal justice involvement.
 
The entire Trump administration has mobilized to address this crisis. On October 26, 2017,
President Trump issued a Presidential Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies to use all lawful means to combat the drug demand and
opioid crisis. A few of the federal agencies included are: the Office of National Drug Control Policy, the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institutes of Health, the The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and The
Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ programs standout as the most wide-reaching, including everything from doctor education to the creation of the Opioid Fraud and Abuse Detection Unit and the Joint Criminal Opioid Darknet Enforcement team.
 
The administration’s response (as outlined on WhiteHouse.gov)
is very long but can be broken down into four components:
 
■ “Address the driving forces of the opioid crisis, including over-prescription, illicit drug supplies, and insufficient access to evidence-based treatment.
■ Reduce demand and over-prescription in part by educating Americans about the dangers of opioid and other drug use.
■ Cut off the supply of illicit drugs by cracking down on international and domestic supply chains that devastate American communities.
■ Help those struggling with addiction through evidence-based treatment and recovery support services.”
 
Like other Trump administration strategies, the plan merges immediate action with mid- and long-term solutions; the private sector aids the public sector; and the human element
is addressed on every level, meaning criminals (producers, dealers, international traffickers) receive stiff punishment (possibly the death penalty for dealers) and the innocent receive short and long term help without judgment, including mental health treatment.
 
One example: At the NH event, Adapt Pharma, which makes Narcan-a nasal spray that can counter effects of an opioid overdose, announced that it has “provided, free-of-charge, four boxes to all colleges and universities in the United States. Two boxes free for every high school in the United States, as well as educational awareness.” That means school administrators who accepted the offer have immediate, effective options - even as paramedics are called - for a particularly vulnerable age group. That means parents can sleep at night. But it also means that, in giving Adapt Pharma what amounts to a bump in their stock, the president understands the role Big Pharma played in creating the crisis and must play to end it. It is common knowledge that addiction is more than just a policy issue to President Trump. “I had a brother, Fred...He had a problem with alcohol, and he would tell me, ‘Don’t drink. Don’t drink.’ . . . He would say it over and over and over again.” To this day, the President abstains from drinking. “I had somebody that guided me, and he had a very, very, very tough life because of alcohol.” Visiting New Hampshire, the President said: “This scourge of drug addiction in America will stop. It will stop. Failure is not an option. We will raise a drug-free generation of American children.”
 
by Anne Doherty for the Novato Republican Women, Federated
Monday, 11 September 2017 14:13

The Value of Lost Labor

Written by

The celebration of Labor Day as of the late 19th century, was meant to honor the contributions made by the labor movement to the prosperity of the United States. It evolved into a more general appreciation for the value and recognition of individual workers in America – those who continued to produce, build, harvest, and transport the goods Americans need. As of 1887, the holiday was observed nationally.

Unfortunately, the recession of 2008 and the subsequent recovery, exposed once and for all the profound shift in our perception of labor as of the late 20th century. We resigned ourselves to status of “service” nation, white collar, pushing higher education as the sole means to the attainment of meaningful employment. We witnessed a neglect of areas of industry and workers within and without our metropolitan areas by the public and the private sector. And, in turn, we engaged in lofty discussion over the economic demise of our country and a growing class of poor Americans.

First, during a recession ignited by our financial institutions, the Obama administration missed an opportunity to invest in very needed skilled labor. In 2009 President Obama instead, to demonstrate that the US would lead the world in combatting global warming, loaned a northern California-based solar panel manufacturer, $535Million, without a market study. The company went bankrupt in 2011, forced to lay off 1,100 employees and unable to repay the loan. In 2015 Hillary Clinton, the Democrat nominee for the presidency, secured the support of organized labor in her candidacy but failed to win the individual votes of its constituency. Union members lacked better job opportunity and improved wages for their continued payment of union dues. As she continued to fundraise on the west coast, she lost the rustbelt. As of 2017, President Trump embarked on campaign promises to woo domestic and foreign investment in manufacturing through tax incentives, to demonstrate that it was our corporate tax system that stymied industry. Yet he said little about investing in the affected communities and jobs training. And to date no one has formally challenged him to what happens when the tax incentives expire.

Second, we are a remarkably over-educated country. About one third of Americans has at least a four-year college degree. This phenomenon has created some unreasonable expectations in job opportunity weighed against the burden of student loan debt. A 2017 Forbes survey found that new college graduates across the country expect to earn $50,000+/year for an entry level position, with no experience. The median household income in the US today is about $52,000/year. These millennials carry student loan debt that delays their ability to buy cars, homes, and save – purchasing power the US continually monitors in assessing the health of our economy.

Third, twenty percent of the individual wealth of the members of the Forbes 400, $491Billion, is concentrated in finance and investment, that is hedge funds, private equity, and banks. Another twenty-five percent of the individual wealth of the Forbes 400, $591Billion, is concentrated in tech. It is hard to measure the commensurate or proportionate creation of jobs and industry in the US in relation to such individual wealth in these sectors. Yet, members of these groups devote a great deal of money to philanthropy and invest in campaigns to mold our social conscience over matters of opportunity, education, taxes, healthcare, the environment, race, and gender.

We seem to lack an interest in a systemic approach to creating a solid job base and opportunity, that could include more than one third of our nation. Instead, we attack easy targets, retail chains and franchises, over minimum wage and healthcare plans. And we have yet to fully accept the effect of localized economic depressions in cities across America. Increased crime, substance abuse, poor health, and civil strife burden our overall system and create a symptomatic approach to these problems.

In 1992, South Carolina commenced formal negotiations with BMW of Germany, providing a model for substantive job creation in the city of Spartanburg. In exchange for building a manufacturing plant, BMW agreed to invest in the local airport, the infrastructure, and the utilities. Instead of property taxes, BMW agreed to fees to the state. To hire more locally in an area with no car manufacturing culture, BMW offered on-job training for those who qualified for employment. To further cultivate its employee base and promote from within, BMW offered a “college-system” program to fund and encourage the continued development of its workers.

The plant went into operation in 1994, providing 9,000 jobs. And despite continued questions over its tax contributions to the state of SC, the state and BMW averted import quotas and taxes for BMW product assembled in the US. To date, the BMW SC plant is the largest producer for the BMW corporation. It remains union free under SC law.

The SC and BMW collaboration demonstrated reasonable and perhaps repeatable economic solutions from four vantage points. First, SC demonstrated moxie negotiating a business plan with a foreign company that would benefit the community, in the wake of losing its local textile industry. Second, BMW found fertile ground in a state willing take on its manufacturing model of apprenticeship and reward despite pressure from unions in Germany and America. Third, US policy allowed an agreement that would result in actual production and provide access to a foreign luxury brand on US soil, avoiding protectionist mechanisms. Fourth, and most importantly, the agreement demonstrated that government could work with industry to create a sound, long-term plan for employment and growth.

Some years ago, the owner of an air-conditioning company came to my home to fix an AC unit, accompanied by a young man, who had just lost his father. In introducing the young man, he explained the “kid” had finished high school and was apprenticing for the summer. If the next three months went well, he would offer the kid a full-time job. The understated magnitude of their agreement was stunning. “Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.” Such a concept might be of value still to mobilize a modern labor movement in the US, provided we can construct a balanced framework of law, policy, and industry in this endeavor.

Sunday, 23 April 2017 22:59

A Foreigner's Perspective

Written by

We ask only that new comers embrace the values of our country.

Friday, 30 December 2016 14:48

Electoral College Test

The election results reminded me of an old cover illustration for the New Yorker magazine.

Thursday, 19 May 2016 23:02

Hillary and Trump

What happened when Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton ran into each other? Donald leans over, and with a smile on

Monday, 29 February 2016 19:48

Social Media Threat

Written by

Social media imperils women in the age of anything goes.

Friday, 01 May 2015 15:32

Recognition of Sacrifice

Written by

At the end of May, the U.S. remembers events that define an important quality of America . . .

Wednesday, 11 March 2015 00:00

Education

Written by
The NRWF Education Committee works to support local students. . . 
Page 2 of 24

COMING EVENTS